الأحد، 26 يونيو، 2011

justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas

images Eminem 2011 Tour Dates justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. 2010 justin bieber 2011 tour
  • 2010 justin bieber 2011 tour


  • snathan
    05-19 06:57 PM
    I am also travelling with the family in June for a couple of months !

    the murthy link and this thread over all is helpful !

    Our company's lawyer mentioned that if the 485 gets approved while abroad then when I come back I just tell the officer at the entry point that I was out and do not have the card in hand. So I enter using AP.


    I also asked him (and in another thread here ) if I can have the card mailed to India by a friend and he said yes, I can do that if I am comfortable with it.

    On a different note , one other person mentioned to me that one has to be in the US when the 485 application is approved or else they can reject the application, but that does not sound true and nor I have heard anything like that from the lawyer or in any of the forums !!

    Then whats the purpose of AP....?




    wallpaper 2010 justin bieber 2011 tour justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. Justin Bieber World Tour 2011 Schedule Mar 05, 2011  July 05, 2010 Grand
  • Justin Bieber World Tour 2011 Schedule Mar 05, 2011 July 05, 2010 Grand


  • meridiani.planum
    07-12 08:33 AM
    Yes, USCIS can raise RFE ability to pay even in I-485 stage.

    thats not true. Can you post a link to back that up?
    The yates memo made it clear that AC-21 portability employers dont have to prove anything (ability-to-pay, test of market etc). The only expectation from them is that they promise you a job with same/similar duties.

    to OP: size of your newemployer should not be a problem,just make sure your job duties are same/similar to what was described in your LC.




    justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. 2010 BRITNEY SPEARS 2011 tour
  • 2010 BRITNEY SPEARS 2011 tour


  • austinsamb
    05-12 09:53 AM
    Some people say this is 6 months, I am not sure and I have been asking on various forums but haven't received a concrete answer yet.

    I travelled out of country last year for few days and got back on November 2008 and my H1 Visa expired on March 2009 (4 months) and I had no problems at the port of entry. I-94 was valid till H1 expiry date. So I dont think the 6 month rule exists but I'm not sure about the 3 month rule. My renewal H1 was also pending approval during my travel.




    2011 Justin Bieber World Tour 2011 Schedule Mar 05, 2011 July 05, 2010 Grand justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. dresses 2010 justin bieber
  • dresses 2010 justin bieber


  • jchan
    05-14 05:25 PM
    As far as I know, there is another one for US Educated Advance Degree in STEM. But I don't remember the number of the bill.

    On what basis are you saying this?
    If EB folks don't want to do anything for their own benefit, there won't be any hope even after 2009. We will be over shadowed by 12 million folks once 2009 kicks in. Good luck finding a solution then.

    We already have 2 bills (HR5882 and HR 5921) in the Judiciary committee, did U call U'r lawmaker and seek support from him/her.

    PD's don't move forward based on ppl praying, it moves based on supply and demand. Right now the demand is very high and the supply of visa is very low. We can improve the supply situation if the bills goes through.



    more...

    justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. 2010 justin bieber 2011 tour
  • 2010 justin bieber 2011 tour


  • deecha
    06-17 01:20 PM
    So if i created an app and sold it, wouldn't i be working for myself and deriving financial compensation?

    He could have developed the app outside the united states. He could have written the app in his spare time (He is not being paid to do it, maybe just a hobby). When he sells the app., it is not a salary. It is more like a dividend or rent (An H1B/F1/etc. can legally own property and derive rent .. it is not employment income). Furthermore, he can set up a LLC or an INC and sell the app through that but he should not have worked for that company while developing that app.

    Lots of ways to get around it. Most laws are subject to interpretation and they're not absolute. If laws were absolute, we'd all be in the grip of tyranny and be slaves. There are only a few natural laws that are absolute.

    As one person said on one of the threads (I think EB2 vs EB3), there is a tendency for people to achieve something and then set the bar just below them to exclude other people from competing with them either through laws or deprivation of resources (History is replete with such examples .. look at the kind of laws and regulations people are trying to pass). We must guard against such behavior/attitude and allow everyone a fair chance to succeed in life.




    justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. justin bieber 2011 tour dates
  • justin bieber 2011 tour dates


  • yabadaba
    06-22 02:54 PM
    bump up



    more...

    justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. 2010 justin bieber 2011 new
  • 2010 justin bieber 2011 new


  • gcisadawg
    03-25 04:52 PM
    voted for vamsi's qn....




    2010 2010 BRITNEY SPEARS 2011 tour justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. Eminem 2011 Tour Dates
  • Eminem 2011 Tour Dates


  • rogerdepena
    07-17 11:45 PM
    haven't you heard 'keep your friends close..keep your enemies closer'...blocking the channel might not help...

    there is an online petition happening here..

    after we have seen what can be achieved, I don't think so it will be really tough to make it clear..

    I already signed the petition but it is also important that we stop watching them. Don't visit CNN.com since it's advertising is based --in a way-- on the number of hits. Don't buy time magazine since it is affiliated with CNN. During casual conversation, if the topic is about news, make it a point to tell your friend that you are doubting the integrity of CNN since some of it's shows are anti-immigrant --both legal and illegal. If you are lucky(or unlucky) to be included in a survey about "NEWS NETWORKS", leave a comment and be specific that you don't like CNN because it supports "Lou Dobbs." This small things might not mean a lot but it's a step to the right direction.



    more...

    justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. justin bieber 2011 tour dates
  • justin bieber 2011 tour dates


  • coopheal
    05-06 12:39 PM
    Transaction ID: 15509419M155420

    You sent a payment of $100.00 USD to Immigration Voice (donations@immigrationvoice.org)

    It may take a few moments for this transaction to appear in your account.

    Thanks




    hair dresses 2010 justin bieber justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. 2011 justin bieber 2011 tour
  • 2011 justin bieber 2011 tour


  • 485Mbe4001
    05-20 01:58 PM
    Its the same story everytime, they will use the AgJobs and effectively kill everything. We, a significantly impacted minority, will end up getting screwed because members were more interested in reading the forums instead of educating the lawmakers.

    Recapture does not increase the number of visas, it simply uses the unallocated visas. If they cannot understand this simple argument then what hope do we have. The anti immigrant forces make it sound like the bill will unleash a wave of immigrants.



    more...

    justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. 2010 justin bieber 2011 tour
  • 2010 justin bieber 2011 tour


  • Dhundhun
    06-03 03:19 PM
    I came across one member who is taking ARRA in Northern california. He is a frequent visitor to IV forumn.

    I have had applied for UI and did not have any issues yet. 9 weeks over. Secondly i have recently asked UI whether they would pay relocation if i get a job in a another state.

    J Thoams

    Thanks Thomas.




    hot 2010 justin bieber 2011 tour justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. justin bieber 2011 tour dates
  • justin bieber 2011 tour dates


  • go_guy123
    08-24 04:52 PM
    ILW.COM - immigration news: Ninth Circuit In Herrera v. <em>USCIS</em> Rules That Revocation Of I-140 Petition Trumps Portability (http://www.ilw.com/articles/2009,0825-mehta.shtm)

    Ninth Circuit In Herrera v. USCIS Rules That Revocation Of I-140 Petition Trumps Portability
    by Cyrus D. Mehta

    As the Employment-based categories remain hopeless backlogged,1 especially for those born in India and China in the Employment-based Second Preference (EB-2) and for the entire world in the Employment-Based Third Preference (EB-3),2 the only silver lining is the ability of the applicant to exercise portability under INA � 204(j).

    Under INA � 204(j), an I-140 petition3 remains valid even if the alien has changed employers or jobs so long as an application for adjustment of status has been filed and remains unadjudicated for 180 days or more and that the applicant has changed jobs or employers in the same or similar occupational classification as the job for which the petition was filed.

    Stated simply, an applicant for adjustment of status (Form I-485) can move to a new employer or change positions with the same employer who filed the I-140 petition as long as the new position is in a same or similar occupation as the original position.4 This individual who has changed jobs can still continue to enjoy the benefits of the I-485 application and the ability to obtain permanent residency. � 204(j), thus, allows one not to be imprisoned with an employer or in one position if an adjustment application is pending for more than 180 days. A delay of more than 180 days may be caused either due to inefficiency with United States Immigration and Citizenship Services (�USCIS�), or more recently, due the retrogression in visa numbers in the EB-2 and EB-3 categories.

    A recent decision from the Ninth Circuit, Herrera v. USCIS, No. 08-55493, 2009 WL 1911596 (C.A. 9 (Cal.)), 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14592,5 unfortunately, may render adjustment applicants who have exercised portability under INA � 204(j) more vulnerable.

    In Herrera v. USCIS, the petitioner in this case, Herrera, was the beneficiary of an approved I-140 petition, which was filed under INA � 203(b)(1)(C) as an alien who seeks to work for a company �in the capacity that is managerial or executive.�6 At Herrera�s adjustment of status interview, the examining officer discovered that she was not truly employed in a managerial or executive capacity for the petitioning employer. The employer who filed the I-140 petition, Jugendstil, did not manufacture furniture, as it stated in the I-140 petition, but rather, engaged in interior designing services. Following the adjustment interview, and long after the adjustment application was pending for more than 180 days, Herrera exercised portability to a new employer. Unfortunately, a few months after she had exercised portability, the California Service Center (�CSC�) issued a notice of intent to revoke Herrera�s previously approved I-140 petition. This notice, which was sent to the prior employer that filed the I-140 petition, alleged that Herrera did not work in a managerial or executive capacity due to the size of the petitioning entity ( which had only 7 employees) and also because of her lack of managerial or executive job duties, which included visits to client sites. The CSC ultimately revoked the I-140 petition after giving Jugendstil an opportunity to respond. This indeed is anomalous, since the original I-140 petitioner, after the alien has exercised portability, may not have an incentive to respond. However, in this case, Jugendstil did appear to have an incentive to respond (and litigate the matter) as Herrera had �ported� to Bay Area Bumpers, an affiliate of Jugendstil. The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) affirmed the denial, and so did the federal district court.

    At issue in Herrera v. USCIS was whether the government�s authority to revoke an I-140 petition under INA � 205 survived portability under INA � 204(j). INA � 205 states, �The Secretary of Homeland Security may, at any time, for what he deems to be good and sufficient cause, revoke the approval of any petition approved by him under section 204. Such revocation shall be effective as of the date of approval of any such petition.�

    The Ninth Circuit agreed with the government that it continued to have the power to revoke a petition under INA � 205 even though the alien may have successfully exercised portability under INA � 204(j). The Ninth Circuit reasoned that in order to �remain valid� under INA � 204(j), the I-140 petition must have been valid from the start. If a petition should never have been approved, the petitioner was not and had never been valid. The Ninth Circuit also cited with approval an AAO decision, which previously held in 2005 that a petition that is deniable, or not approvable, will not be considered valid for purposes under INA � 204(j).7 Finally, the Ninth Circuit reasoned that if Herrera�s argument prevailed, it would have unintended practical consequences, which Congress never intended. For instance, an alien who exercised portability, such as Herrera, would be immune to revocation, but an alien who remained with the petitioning employer would not be able to be so immune. If the opposite were true, according to the Ninth Circuit, an applicant would have a huge incentive to change jobs in order to escape the revocation of an I-140 petition. Finally, the Ninth Circuit also examined the merits of the revocation, and held that the AAO�s decision was supported by substantial evidence.8

    Based on the holding in Herrera v. USCIS, adjustment applicants who have exercised portability better beware in the event that the USCIS later decides to revoke your I-140 petition. 8 CFR � 205.2 (a), which implements INA � 205, gives authority to any Service officer to revoke a petition �when the necessity of revocation comes to the attention of the Service.� Also, under 8 CFR � 205.2(b), the Service needs to only give notice to the petitioner of the revocation and an opportunity to rebut. An adjustment applicant who has exercised portability may not be so fortunate to have a petitioner who may be interested in responding to the notice of revocation, leave alone informing this individual who may no longer be within his or her prior employer�s orbit.

    Finally, of most concern, is whether every revocation dooms the adjustment applicant who has �ported� under INA � 204(j). Not all revocations are caused by the fact that the petition may have not been valid from the very outset. For instance, under the automatic revocation provisions in 8 CFR � 205.1(a)(3)(iii), an I-140 petition may be automatically revoked �[u]pon written notice of withdrawal filed by the petitioner, in employment-based preference cases, with any officer of the Service who is authorized to grant or deny petitions.� An employer may routinely, out of abundant caution, decide to inform the USCIS if its employee leaves, even though he or she may legitimately assert portability as a pending adjustment applicant. Such a revocation of the I-140 ought to be distinguished from Herrera v. USCIS as the I-140 was valid from its inception but for the fact that the employer initiated the withdrawal. Similarly, another ground for automatic termination is upon the termination of the employer�s business.9 It would not make sense to deny someone portability if the petitioning entity, which previously sponsored him or her, went out of business, but was viable at the time it had sponsored the alien. Indeed, one Q&A in the Aytes Memo, supra, at least addresses the issue of an employer�s withdrawal:10

    �Question 11. When is an I-140 no longer valid for porting purposes?�

    Answer: An I-140 petition is no longer valid for porting purposes when:

    1. an I-140 is withdrawn before the alien�s I-485 has been pending 180 days, or
    2. an I-140 is denied or revoked at any time except when it is revoked based on a withdrawal that was submitted after an I-485 has been pending for 180 days.�

    It is hoped that Herrera v. USCIS, a classic instance of bad facts making bad law, does not affect those whose petitions have been revoked after the original employer submitted a withdrawal after an I-485 application was pending for more than 180 days. The Aytes Memo makes clear that this should not be the case. Less clear is whether a revocation caused by the termination of the employer�s business should have an impact on an adjustment applicant�s ability to exercise portability.11 The Aytes Memo seems to suggest that such a person who has exercised portability may be jeopardized if the I-140 petition is revoked. It is one thing to deny portability to someone whose I-140 petition was never valid, although hopefully the individual who has ported ought to be given the ability to challenge the revocation in addition to the original petitioner.12 On the other hand, there is absolutely no justification to deny portability when revocation of an I-140 petition occurs upon the business terminating, after it had been viable when the I-140 was filed and approved, or when the employer submits a notice of withdrawal of the I-140 petition after the I-485 has been pending for more than 180 days.



    more...

    house 2010 justin bieber 2011 tour. justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. 2010 +april+2011+tour+dates
  • 2010 +april+2011+tour+dates


  • sanatshah
    10-12 12:20 PM
    My I-485 reached to NSC on July 17th. Still waiting on RN.:(




    tattoo justin bieber 2011 tour dates justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. hot girlfriend justin bieber
  • hot girlfriend justin bieber


  • blackberry
    01-21 02:47 PM
    Can soneone help me with this question.....please....

    My husband is on H1B and I'm on Ead.....both of us have expired I-94 stamps.....we are planing to go to our home country this year...we want to apply for advance parole......my question is.....can we enter U.S both of us with AD?
    I read on Uscis website that you need to have personal reason in order to go to your country while I-485 is pending....and you have to prove your personal reason.....is that true....we want only to visit our parents.

    Thanks in advance!
    I came back last year December, no issues, No questions asked. The entire process was very smooth.
    Just remember to carry all your documents.



    more...

    pictures 2010 justin bieber 2011 new justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. 2010 Tour Dates 2011 justin
  • 2010 Tour Dates 2011 justin


  • tnite
    06-18 12:10 PM
    thanks tnite!!!... u r right my opt/h1b overlaped comfortably and i was never out of status

    But the problem is that you have to send in a copy of your H1B visa for I485.
    The visa will mention the fact that it was issued in May 2007

    USCIS might ask you 'Place of last entry: 2000" and how come you have a visa with a issue date of May 2007.
    That means that you were at a US port of entry recently.

    I think putting your canadian date is the best option.(My opinion)
    You can always tell USCIS that you were issued a visa in Canada and technically you left the US and came back again in May 2007




    dresses justin bieber 2011 tour dates justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. 2010 justin bieber 2011 tour
  • 2010 justin bieber 2011 tour


  • kbsyed61
    04-23 02:20 PM
    June 31?



    more...

    makeup justin bieber 2011 tour dates justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. 2010 justin bieber 2011 tour.
  • 2010 justin bieber 2011 tour.


  • TexDBoy
    09-10 09:09 PM
    If your Opt is till Dec ... why did you get H1B with no I-94 ...

    I thought that only happens if you have gap between OPT and H1B ...




    girlfriend hot girlfriend justin bieber justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. justin bieber 2011 tour dates
  • justin bieber 2011 tour dates


  • somegchuh
    10-31 01:39 PM
    just as FYI, they mailed back the original 797 with the passport.




    hairstyles 2010 justin bieber 2011 tour justin bieber 2011 tour dates in texas. makeup Justin Bieber Tour
  • makeup Justin Bieber Tour


  • rajarao
    09-08 10:03 PM
    I got the same mail and kept me thinking about it; Just another way USCIS keeps us on our toes and in suspense, since the years of wait is not sufficient.....; Anyway, looks things are moving. Great Job by IV and the teams, starting from July 2007 visa bulletin; the community is great and good source of information. I will do my best to continue my support for IV as before and to all the immigrants or waiting to be one. Good luck to everyone.




    Lasantha
    10-06 07:48 AM
    same here,

    we have applied every year and I often hear back from people who do win this loterry, somehow it didi not work out for us...at least, not yet!

    anyway, getting ready to apply this weekend..who knows, maybe this is our lucky year..

    cheers

    That's what I'm talking about ! :cool:




    Ramba
    01-04 12:07 PM
    I am in non-IT engineering field having stressful job, as my job is always challanging. Though, I have good career record, I want to get into relaxing job. I am getting advise to change my field to IT. Few of them advise me to take course in QA or SAP to change the field.

    As most of the forum members are in IT field, perhaps this is a right place to get some advise.

    I want to have a relaxing/flexible job as I want to enjoy the job (no brainy job, as I have done enough in my field). Are these QA or SAP jobs are stress free? What is the prospects or future for those jobs in long term? Before giving up 10 year career in engineering, I would like to do trade studies.

    Thanks..



    ليست هناك تعليقات:

    إرسال تعليق