whattodo21
01-28 09:15 AM
If waiting for decades is not considered backlogged, don't know what it should be called!
wallpaper 2nd Annual Mary J. Blige
vaishnavilakshmi
06-19 02:36 AM
Hi,
Eb2 Priority date (priority date-june2004) , I-140 approved
Eb3 priorty date (substituted labor with priorit date as feb2002) applied for I-140 on
1st jun 2007 .waiting for i-140 approval.
Should I file for i-485 on Eb2 where I-140 is already approved or use Eb3 where I-140 is pending but priorty date feb2002 ????????????
Attorneys and members,
please suggest me,i have only 1day left for decision,
vaishu
Eb2 Priority date (priority date-june2004) , I-140 approved
Eb3 priorty date (substituted labor with priorit date as feb2002) applied for I-140 on
1st jun 2007 .waiting for i-140 approval.
Should I file for i-485 on Eb2 where I-140 is already approved or use Eb3 where I-140 is pending but priorty date feb2002 ????????????
Attorneys and members,
please suggest me,i have only 1day left for decision,
vaishu
10dulkar
08-08 09:53 AM
But the July 2nd decision was reversed later. Why did they not file then?
Besides, companies do not need to pay for 485. Makes no sense for them to pay for something that they do not have to.
On a separate note, does anyone know of any company which has discontinued GC processing because the new rule states the employer has to pay for PERM?
That's our company policy(1 year bond of course)
BTW they did file after July17th.:o
Besides, companies do not need to pay for 485. Makes no sense for them to pay for something that they do not have to.
On a separate note, does anyone know of any company which has discontinued GC processing because the new rule states the employer has to pay for PERM?
That's our company policy(1 year bond of course)
BTW they did file after July17th.:o
2011 At the 2nd Annual Mary J.
kirupa
02-24 03:35 AM
Hi Sam!
I am not too familiar with ASPX and Silverlight, but I'll take a shot at this!
Are you using the Silverlight control that is found in ASPX to insert your silverlight content?
Thanks,
Kirupa
I am not too familiar with ASPX and Silverlight, but I'll take a shot at this!
Are you using the Silverlight control that is found in ASPX to insert your silverlight content?
Thanks,
Kirupa
more...
wandmaker
04-30 02:37 PM
I have a couple of questions regarding H1B.
My current H1B(10th year) is expiring in a month and I am planning to use EAD. My 140 is approved and 485 is pending for over 2 years with company A. At the same time my second 140 is pending with company B.
The question is, in case if I used my EAD to work and for some reason if my 485 is denied, can I get back to my H1B? I was under the impression that I will have to leave the country and wait for 1 year to reset the clock but I was told by someone that its not necessary to wait for an year and I can file a H1B based on my pending I-140 with company B and will have to do it while outside of the country. ( This process does not require a new quota).
Is this true? any ideas?
Given the situation for 485 denial. AFAIK, You have an option of filing for H1B (not counted against quota) based on your B's labor approval and pending 140. Once you use the EAD, technically you don't have the H1B status to transfer or extend. Hence, it will require you to go to consulate (b/c approval will come without I94) to stamp, and start working for Company B after you return.
My current H1B(10th year) is expiring in a month and I am planning to use EAD. My 140 is approved and 485 is pending for over 2 years with company A. At the same time my second 140 is pending with company B.
The question is, in case if I used my EAD to work and for some reason if my 485 is denied, can I get back to my H1B? I was under the impression that I will have to leave the country and wait for 1 year to reset the clock but I was told by someone that its not necessary to wait for an year and I can file a H1B based on my pending I-140 with company B and will have to do it while outside of the country. ( This process does not require a new quota).
Is this true? any ideas?
Given the situation for 485 denial. AFAIK, You have an option of filing for H1B (not counted against quota) based on your B's labor approval and pending 140. Once you use the EAD, technically you don't have the H1B status to transfer or extend. Hence, it will require you to go to consulate (b/c approval will come without I94) to stamp, and start working for Company B after you return.
desibechara
02-28 01:55 PM
L1 GC process is the best way to get Gc nowadays. within 6 months u can get it..I know someone(from India) who did.
you don't have to convert it to H1
DB
you don't have to convert it to H1
DB
more...
485_spouse
09-28 05:59 PM
Andrew Sullivan, uber-blogger and one of the country's most influential political pundits warns that our paralyzed immigration system is at a point where it is harming our economic security: The legal immigration system - the same one that has kept me in limbo for a quarter of a century - is reaching a breaking point. Skilled immigrants are returning home to the more fertile opportunities in China and India because America makes it almost impossible for talented immigrants to move here: "What was a trickle has become a flood," says Duke University's Vivek Wadhwa, who studies reverse immigration. Wadhwa projects...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/andrew-sullivan-immigration-system-at-a-breaking-point.html)
One and only one Andrew Sullivan who got special deal from Justice department.
Immigration process which tries to keep pot smokers away from USA is broken indeed.
Andrew Sullivan the special ONE (http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/09/sullivan_avoids_pot_charges.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/andrew-sullivan-immigration-system-at-a-breaking-point.html)
One and only one Andrew Sullivan who got special deal from Justice department.
Immigration process which tries to keep pot smokers away from USA is broken indeed.
Andrew Sullivan the special ONE (http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/09/sullivan_avoids_pot_charges.html)
2010 of mary j blige hairstyles
GoldenBoy
10-13 07:09 AM
so its possible to edit swfs from swift in to flash mx or something
if so thats how?what id like to now
thanks:)
if so thats how?what id like to now
thanks:)
more...
thesparky007
05-02 08:09 PM
haha lol!
hair Mary J Blige Hairstyles
jliechty
June 18th, 2005, 04:14 AM
In general, macro lenses around 100mm are good for most kinds of macro photography. They have too much working distance for use on a copy stand, and not quite enough for skittish and/or dangerous insects or small animals. For general purpose stuff, the angle of view is such that you get enough background isolation to be worthwhile (you can rotate around your subject just a bit to get a highlight out of the background, while a 50mm macro takes in more background and makes this difficult).
I got a used Tamron 90mm, and let's just say that the build quality does not inspire confidence - however, the image quality is excellent. From what little I've seen of the Sigma 105mm macro (and from the many images that the members here have posted), it appears to have a bit better build quality and fine image quality as well. The Nikon macro is not going to be much better, if at all, in image quality than these, and you will pay dearly for the brand name. The one macro lens to avoid, however, is a "Phoenix" macro that only goes to 1:2 (that means that you can't get enough magnification for most small insects and flowers to fill the frame) and is most likely more cheaply built than my Tamron. Almost every other macro lens goes to 1:1 these days, and you can get the nicer ones used from KEH for not much more, so there's no reason to buy not-so-ideal lenses that you'll outgrow in no time anyway.
I got a used Tamron 90mm, and let's just say that the build quality does not inspire confidence - however, the image quality is excellent. From what little I've seen of the Sigma 105mm macro (and from the many images that the members here have posted), it appears to have a bit better build quality and fine image quality as well. The Nikon macro is not going to be much better, if at all, in image quality than these, and you will pay dearly for the brand name. The one macro lens to avoid, however, is a "Phoenix" macro that only goes to 1:2 (that means that you can't get enough magnification for most small insects and flowers to fill the frame) and is most likely more cheaply built than my Tamron. Almost every other macro lens goes to 1:1 these days, and you can get the nicer ones used from KEH for not much more, so there's no reason to buy not-so-ideal lenses that you'll outgrow in no time anyway.