srinivas_meena_vinu
07-18 12:05 PM
Thanks.
Mine is not a Lobour substitution. In fact I am in L1A and mine has been filed in EB3 category. It is done by PERM and it has been approved. My designation is Program Manager and based on that the Labour was filed. My company is doing well and also pays well.
Please advice if that would help.
Mine is not a Lobour substitution. In fact I am in L1A and mine has been filed in EB3 category. It is done by PERM and it has been approved. My designation is Program Manager and based on that the Labour was filed. My company is doing well and also pays well.
Please advice if that would help.
wallpaper Weeds Season 5
ice_mountain
07-17 08:16 PM
1. The title noted on the labor form was "Associate". On the job description letter, is it ok if the title is noted as "Financial Associate Analyst". Plus my labor was approved as IS Manager. Would the "financial" title cause a problem?
2. My lawyer put a very generic sentence as my job description. Does my job experience letter have to have the exact same generic sentence in it? and is it ok if the letter has more duties on it other than the one mentioned on the labor form (i did different stuff at that job, finance, IT, sales etc)
3. My lawyer put the required degree on the labor form as "Computer Science". However; I have a MIS degree. Is that going to be a problem when applying for i140?
2. My lawyer put a very generic sentence as my job description. Does my job experience letter have to have the exact same generic sentence in it? and is it ok if the letter has more duties on it other than the one mentioned on the labor form (i did different stuff at that job, finance, IT, sales etc)
3. My lawyer put the required degree on the labor form as "Computer Science". However; I have a MIS degree. Is that going to be a problem when applying for i140?
Blog Feeds
07-09 12:30 PM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
2011 weeds season 1 dvd. weeds
gccovet
10-07 01:49 PM
also found this on the net:
http://www.nafsa.org/uploadedFiles/acwia_-_american_competitiveness.pdf?n=6685
page 6/18 - section (vi)
Excellent!!!!! Thanks a lot, VA_Dude
GCCovet
http://www.nafsa.org/uploadedFiles/acwia_-_american_competitiveness.pdf?n=6685
page 6/18 - section (vi)
Excellent!!!!! Thanks a lot, VA_Dude
GCCovet
more...
[uber]
04-09 03:47 AM
and yes i separated it...
i got this idea from the ipod chicken sandwhich thread
i got this idea from the ipod chicken sandwhich thread
nain
03-27 04:46 PM
I am on H4 visa and my husband is on H1 visa. My husband is working in N.Y. city as a programmer analyst.
I am pregnant by 5 months. I have following questions :-
- Can I apply for Medicare benefits. By applying Medicare benefits I will get free milk,baby food and medical treatments.
- By applying Medicare does it affects my husband green card process or in future citizenship.
Thanks for your time and efforts to answer my questions.
I am pregnant by 5 months. I have following questions :-
- Can I apply for Medicare benefits. By applying Medicare benefits I will get free milk,baby food and medical treatments.
- By applying Medicare does it affects my husband green card process or in future citizenship.
Thanks for your time and efforts to answer my questions.
more...
DDD
03-13 10:00 AM
i do not see a picture.
2010 Season 2 Weeds - Season 3
mansour
09-08 09:58 PM
Noobie Hijacker - alert!!
more...
mrjonie
10-29 03:58 PM
I havent received my EAD/AP, only received receipts..i applied on Aug 15th.
hair Season 2 Weeds - Season 3
aksvk
09-22 12:06 AM
Hi,
I have an approved H1B for teaching Maths, but I got an offer for teaching ESL (I am certified in both the subject). Am I allowed to teach ESL also? Is the visa subject specific?
Thanks!
I have an approved H1B for teaching Maths, but I got an offer for teaching ESL (I am certified in both the subject). Am I allowed to teach ESL also? Is the visa subject specific?
Thanks!
more...
martinvisalaw
10-15 03:56 PM
The safest route is to have both the H-1B and the EAD, if the employer agrees to pay for all. If you just have an EAD and the 485 is denied for some reason, you have no work authorization. If you have the H-1B also, then you can continue to work on that.
The filing fees for a H-1B extension depend on how many extensions have been filed already. Assuming it is not the very first H-1B, then the filing fee is $320, and $1500 if it is the first extension.
The filing fees for a H-1B extension depend on how many extensions have been filed already. Assuming it is not the very first H-1B, then the filing fee is $320, and $1500 if it is the first extension.
hot Season 6 DVD Cover weeds
alucard666
08-11 05:20 PM
She has hired an accountant to do the taxes at the end of the year and a contractor who manages a web site, keeps the paperwork and provides the services. She has not hired anyone full time since it is a very small operation with approx. $500 in income per month.
more...
house weeds season 5 cover.
lostinbeta
10-04 01:37 AM
OOOO Swirly =)
I likes :)
I likes :)
tattoo DVD Front Cover middot; Season
tb2904
07-02 12:15 PM
http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3263.html
more...
pictures tattoo dvd-cover weeds season
ameryki
06-18 04:14 PM
as long as you enter the country back on or before Sept 30th 2010 you will be in good shape otherwise you will need a new visa to enter.
dresses tattoo weeds season 1 dvd
plakshmi
08-30 10:07 AM
My date will be current from September 1st. Is it okay to travel to India on a short trip while the date is current? If 485 gets approved while I am india, can I still come back on advance parole?
more...
makeup weeds season 5 dvd cover.
Bpositive
02-03 01:00 AM
After security clearance what?
girlfriend weeds season 5 cover. images
Canadian_Dream
04-05 02:47 PM
I have sent an email to Franklin.
hairstyles Weeds: Season Six Blu-ray
raysaikat
07-31 07:21 PM
Hello all,
I am currently on H1B visa working for an IT company. I have got an admit for this Fall to do my MS and I was planning to study using my EAD. Now there seems to be some risk in using my EAD and so I want to apply for F1. I have applied for I-485 (Adjustment of status) along with my husband's green card application.
My question is:
1: Is it a problem to apply for F1 if my I-485 is pending approval ? The reason I ask is, F1 is a Non Immigrant visa and I-485 is for a green card (which is Immigrant visa).
2: Would my F1 application cause my 485 to be denied or vice versa ?
Thanks in advance
Your F-1 will probably be denied since you have expressed intent to immigrate by filing I-485. What's the problem with using EAD (assuming that you are the dependent)?
I am currently on H1B visa working for an IT company. I have got an admit for this Fall to do my MS and I was planning to study using my EAD. Now there seems to be some risk in using my EAD and so I want to apply for F1. I have applied for I-485 (Adjustment of status) along with my husband's green card application.
My question is:
1: Is it a problem to apply for F1 if my I-485 is pending approval ? The reason I ask is, F1 is a Non Immigrant visa and I-485 is for a green card (which is Immigrant visa).
2: Would my F1 application cause my 485 to be denied or vice versa ?
Thanks in advance
Your F-1 will probably be denied since you have expressed intent to immigrate by filing I-485. What's the problem with using EAD (assuming that you are the dependent)?
bigboy007
11-01 11:40 AM
Hello i am running in to issues of how to get address changed. To give you guys previews. We were residing in Chicago till July ending. In August we moved to CT as my wife got a new job there. But since my work location is in IL , I requested my employer whether its possible to work remotely and its ok by law. He said u can change ur residential address and there is no need to amend LCa/H1b as there is no change in work location in my case. Fine for now.
I recently visited CT DMV and requested for CT state license. They denied to me saying that i need a CT employer letter or My employer should issue letter to DMV stating my work location changed. Neither of these are going to happen. For now i have my license and Plate from IL itself. I can still continue to maintain but renewing Plates and Pollution test are pain being in CT any ideas please ?
I recently visited CT DMV and requested for CT state license. They denied to me saying that i need a CT employer letter or My employer should issue letter to DMV stating my work location changed. Neither of these are going to happen. For now i have my license and Plate from IL itself. I can still continue to maintain but renewing Plates and Pollution test are pain being in CT any ideas please ?
sukhyani
10-04 03:40 PM
My understanding is that USCIS pre-adjudicates every application and requests fingerprint/namecheck, even if the dates are not current. It is done to weed out denials right away - you don't need to wait for PD to become current to be denied.
So that means they are just going to pre-adjudicate his application and issue him his GC once the Visa numbers become current?
I was in this impression that they would start processing an application only when the PD of that application becomes current and hence the six months or more lead time.
So that means they are just going to pre-adjudicate his application and issue him his GC once the Visa numbers become current?
I was in this impression that they would start processing an application only when the PD of that application becomes current and hence the six months or more lead time.
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق